Multi-geminal wave functions

General discussion of the Cambridge quantum Monte Carlo code CASINO; how to install and setup; how to use it; what it does; applications.
Pablo_Lopez_Rios
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 1:25 am

Re: Multi-geminal wave functions

Post by Pablo_Lopez_Rios »

Hi Vladimir,

Thanks very much for your fixes. Clearly there are several codepaths in the geminals module that were in desperate need of testing (and there will likely be more).

If you let me have your email address (by email via the forum, for example) I can put you in as the commit author to properly attribute the changes.

Thanks,
Pablo
Hey there! I am using CASINO.
Vladimir_Konjkov
Posts: 196
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2015 3:14 pm

Re: Multi-geminal wave functions

Post by Vladimir_Konjkov »

Following the geminal work earlier in this thread, a friendly challenge for anyone who enjoys squeezing trial wave functions.

The task: get the lowest fixed-node DMC energy for the all-electron Ne atom, using

- any single-determinant input wave function — HF, DFT, OO-MP2 natural orbitals, or anything else, in a Gaussian or Slater basis (gwfn.data / stowfn.data); no multideterminant expansions;
- plus anything CASINO can put on top of it: Jastrow + backflow + geminals (MAGP, psi_s : geminal).

Why Ne: the correlation is purely dynamical — no near-degeneracies, so no cheap multideterminant fix; a Jastrow–Slater–backflow wave function already leaves only a few mHa of fixed-node error. Whatever you gain here, you gain by genuinely improving the nodes.

The bar to beat is the orbital-dependent backflow (OBF) result of Holzmann & Moroni, Phys. Rev. B 99, 085121 (2019) [arXiv:1910.07167], Table I:

VMC = -128.91956(21) DMC = -128.93129(28)

Whoever posts a DMC energy below the OBF number (with a sensible time step and an honest error bar in CASINO outputs) wins.

Best regards,
Vladimir.
dark matter makes up most of something
but no one knows exactly what
it holds the galaxies together
like feelings no one talks about
Post Reply